Content ↔ Strategy Alignment Evaluator

Scores from 0-10 how well a piece of content serves the user's authority strategy. The goal isn't to pick the content that's "good in style," but the content that best fits the purpose.

It doesn't assume the strategy; it first reads it from the real source (hedef-karti.md + strategy context). It scores content across 6 dimensions: S1 promise-alignment (the "domain authority by measuring AI + conversion expert" through-line), S2 moat / measured-case (the brand's real protection), S3 funnel-stage alignment + CTA, S4 target-audience fit (B2C curiosity-hook + B2B decision-maker), S5 tone (empowerment + plain language; not fear-selling/hype), and S6 platform-role fit. Moat and promise-alignment are the heaviest dimensions.

When to use it: When deciding which of several content ideas/drafts to produce first, when auditing before publishing whether a draft harms the strategy, when answering the question "viral, but is it on-brand?"

Output: A total /10 + a one-sentence diagnosis, a quote-justified score for each dimension, the strategy goals the content feeds (moat_case / youtube_subscriber / linkedin / cadence / t1), and the biggest gap + priority-ordered fix suggestions. On request, the same result is also given in JSON format. The output is a plain-English (Turkish) markdown report.